Czy Bóg cierpi? Uwagi polemiczne do artykułu Dariusza Łukasiewicza
Abstract
Author: Pepliński Marek
Title: Does God suffer? Some critical remarks on Dariusz Łukasiewicz’s paper ‘The suffering of God and the evil’ (Czy Bóg cierpi? Uwagi polemiczne do artykułu Dariusza Łukasiewicza 'Cierpienie Boga za zło')
Source: Filo-Sofija
year: 2006, vol:.6, number: 2006/1, pages: 257-266
Keywords: WEINANDY, GOD'S SUFFERING, ŁUKASIEWICZ, THEODICY, PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY
Discipline: PHILOSOPHY
Language: POLISH
Document type: ARTICLE
Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address):
E-mail: marek[DOT]peplinski[AT]univ[DOT]gda[DOT]pl
www:
Abstract: Author of article argues that Dariusz Łukasiewicz's criticism of Thomas G. Weinandy's book Czy Bóg cierpi?, directed towards three arguments for impassibility of God doesn't defeat Weinandy's theses. There are three reasons of this state of affairs. First, Łukasiewicz criticism doesn't take into account metaphysical nature of Weinandy's arguments concerning nature of suffering and God. Second, some of assumptions are attributed by Łukasiewicz to author of Does God suffer? mistakenly. Third, Łukasiewicz criticism that Weinandy's thought is too optimistic doesn't realize that philosophy cannot justify or disprove all theological theses, because many of them are beyund the reach of human reason. Article ends with some suggestions about proper use of analogy in attribution of properties to God.
Title: Does God suffer? Some critical remarks on Dariusz Łukasiewicz’s paper ‘The suffering of God and the evil’ (Czy Bóg cierpi? Uwagi polemiczne do artykułu Dariusza Łukasiewicza 'Cierpienie Boga za zło')
Source: Filo-Sofija
year: 2006, vol:.6, number: 2006/1, pages: 257-266
Keywords: WEINANDY, GOD'S SUFFERING, ŁUKASIEWICZ, THEODICY, PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY
Discipline: PHILOSOPHY
Language: POLISH
Document type: ARTICLE
Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address):
E-mail: marek[DOT]peplinski[AT]univ[DOT]gda[DOT]pl
www:
Abstract: Author of article argues that Dariusz Łukasiewicz's criticism of Thomas G. Weinandy's book Czy Bóg cierpi?, directed towards three arguments for impassibility of God doesn't defeat Weinandy's theses. There are three reasons of this state of affairs. First, Łukasiewicz criticism doesn't take into account metaphysical nature of Weinandy's arguments concerning nature of suffering and God. Second, some of assumptions are attributed by Łukasiewicz to author of Does God suffer? mistakenly. Third, Łukasiewicz criticism that Weinandy's thought is too optimistic doesn't realize that philosophy cannot justify or disprove all theological theses, because many of them are beyund the reach of human reason. Article ends with some suggestions about proper use of analogy in attribution of properties to God.
Pełny tekst:
PDFAdministracja Cytowania | Strony czasopism